QX Interoperability - v.0.7
  • đź’ˇABOUT
    • License
    • How to Give Attribution For Usage of QX Interoperability
  • 👬Industry Initiatives
    • ISO Interoperability Framework
    • EEA Crosschain Interoperability Specification Suite
    • IEEE Standards for Blockchain Interoperability
    • ICMA Bond Data Taxonomy
    • IETF Secure Asset Transfer Protocol
    • SODA MIT Crosschain Interop WG
    • Decentralized ID for Tokenization
    • Cross-chain Interoperability Alliance
    • SWIFT Coalition
    • BIS Projects
    • MAS Projects
    • Regulated Liability Network
      • UK Finance - Regulated Liability Network
      • US - Regulated Liability Network
    • Hyperledger Projects
    • EEA-OASIS L2 WG
    • RollColl WG
    • ITU Digital Currency Global Initiative
    • EIP-5164: Cross-Chain Execution
    • EIP-3220: Crosschain Identifier Specification
    • EIP-7281: Sovereign Bridged Token
    • ERC-7092: Financial Bonds
    • ERC-3643: Permissioned Tokens
    • ERC1400: Universal Token for Assets and Payments
    • ERC6960: Dual Layer Token
    • CASA CAIPs
    • COSMOS IBC
    • Polkadot XCM
    • IEEE Crosschain Workshop
  • 🏦Use Cases
    • Payments/Digital Asset Transactions
      • Enable transfers of digital payment tokens
      • Conduct Compliant Cross-VASP Digital Asset Transaction
      • Swap NFT for Tokenized Bank Deposits
      • Enable Intra-Group Payments with Tokenised Deposits
    • Wholesale CBDC (wCBDC)
      • Enable Settlement with Simultaneous Delivery versus Payment
      • Facilitate Cross-Border Payments with wCBDC
      • Enable FX transactions to facilitate cross-border payments
      • Settle Crypto Derivatives using wCBDC
      • Access Liquidity via wCBDC
      • Settle Interbank Payments with wCBDC
      • Settle Interbank Payments with wCBDC (Acquirer-Merchant Settlement)
      • Make Property Payments with Tokenized Deposits
      • Provide FX Liquidity using wCBDC
      • Enable Payment versus Payment (PvP)
      • Crosschain digital bonds trades
    • Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
      • Aggregate Yields across Blockchains for Corporate Treasuries
    • Retail CBDC (rCBDC)
      • Provide Targeted Government Transfers (Government Vouchers)
      • Streamline Home Equity Lending
      • Provide Corporate Vouchers and Rewards
      • Make Milestone-Based Property Purchase Payments
      • Enable Traceable and Targeted Donations
      • Consumer Prepayments to Corporations
      • Enable Asset Transactions
      • Enable Cross-Border Remittances
      • Government Payouts
      • Managing Learning Accounts
    • Private Markets/Asset Tokenization and Trading
      • Tokenize and Trade Private Equity Fund Shares
      • Distribute and Settle Private Corporate Debt Issuance
      • Trade Employee Stock Grants as Digital Securities
      • Enable Secondary Trading for Non-Listed Assets and Private Markets
      • Automated Discretionary Portfolio Management with Tokenized Assets
    • Trade & Commerce
      • Support Tokenized Electronic Bills of Lading for Global Trade
      • Commercial Vouchers
      • Online Commerce
      • Programmable Rewards
    • DAOs
  • 🛠️Solutions Providers
    • Swift
    • Mastercard
    • Fnality
    • Quant Network
    • Ownera
    • Fujitsu
    • Deutsche Bank/Standard Chartered Ventures
    • Kaleido
    • Onyx/JP Morgan
    • Canton Network
    • Universal Digital Payments Network Alliance
    • Li.Fi
    • Visa
    • Partior
    • CLSNet
    • Impel
    • Adhara
    • Datachain
    • Ant Group
    • CitiGroup
    • WeBank
    • IMF ?
    • BIS ?
    • Progmat ?
    • GroundX ?
  • đź““Requirements
    • Legal & Regulatory Layer
    • Governance and Policies Layer
      • Audit and Compliance sub-layer
      • Operations sub-layer
    • Application Layer
    • Integration and Middleware Layer
      • Oracle sub-layer
    • Semantic Layer
    • Syntactic Layer
    • Foundational Layer
      • Discovery sub-layer
      • Smart contract sub-layer
      • Function call sub-layer
      • Messaging sub-layer
      • Transaction sub-layer
      • Consensus sub-layer
      • Data transfer sub-layer
      • Security sub-layer
        • Identity and Authentication
        • Data Privacy
    • -
  • Protocol Providers
    • Chainlink
    • Axelar
    • Connext
    • Across
    • Toposware
    • IBC
    • Hyperlane
    • Sovereign Labs
    • Polymer Labs
    • Orb Labs
    • Zetachain
    • Sygma
    • deBridge
    • Wormhole
    • Routeur Protocol
    • Synapse
    • Wanchain
    • Gnosis
    • LayerZero
    • Comparison
  • Bridging Approaches
    • Bridges
    • Native Bridge
    • Third Party bridge
    • Multi-bridge
    • Oracle
    • Shared Sequencer
    • Mechanisms
      • Hash Locking
      • Notary Schemes
      • Proof Aggregation
    • zk-rollup ecosystems
    • Intent-centric
    • Function Calls
    • Relayers
      • Multisig
      • MPC
      • Light Client
      • ZKP Stark
      • ZKP Snark
      • Hybrid method
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • About
  • Description
  • Example

Was this helpful?

  1. Use Cases

DAOs

About

Use Case Category
Use Case Scope

DAOs

This use case involves a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) leveraging cross-chain capabilities to enable governance across multiple blockchains.

Description

Key Stakeholders:

DAO Participants

Story:

  1. The DAO deploys voting contracts on high throughput chains.

  2. Participants can vote on proposals with no or low transaction fees on these chains.

  3. Voting results are relayed back to the core governance contracts on the main chain.

  4. The DAO can also govern smart contracts deployed across multiple chains.

  5. Changes to contract parameters are seamlessly propagated across chains.

Postconditions:

The cross-chain DAO provides censorship resistant on-chain governance across multiple blockchains, increasing participation and flexibility.

Example


Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) could leverage cross-chain interoperability to enable on-chain voting on one or multiple higher-throughput blockchain networks, with the results then relayed back to the higher-cost blockchain network where the protocol’s core governance contracts exist. This would incentivize greater participation by decreasing the transaction costs for DAO participants while still maintaining on-chain transparency and censorship resistance for each participant.

Furthermore, a cross-chain DAO could govern and modify the parameters of smart contracts across different blockchain networks in a seamless manner, expanding the scope of what can be governed by token holders within one or multiple on-chain environments.

Sources:

  • Chainlink

  • Uniswap

PreviousProgrammable RewardsNextSolutions Providers

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

🏦
Page cover image