QX DeFi Risks Compass
  • 💡GETTING STARTED
    • About
    • License
    • How to Give Attribution For Usage of QX DeFi Risks Compass
  • 🏦Risks in TradFI
    • Global Finance - Key Framework
    • Risk Frameworks
    • Basics I - Terminology & Concepts
  • ⛓️RISKS IN DEFI
    • Deciphering DeFi Risks
    • DeFi Risk Management
    • EEA DeFi Risk Assessment Guidelines
    • Basics II - DeFi
  • 🥷Systematic Risks
    • Market Risk
      • Defining Market Risk
      • Assessing Market Risk
      • Managing Market Risk
      • In Practice
      • Liquidity Risk
        • Defining Liquidity Risk
        • Assessing Liquidity Risk
        • Managing Liquidity Risk
        • In Practice
    • Compliance & Legal Risk
      • Defining Compliance & Legal Risk
      • Assessing Compliance Risk
      • Managing Compliance Risk
      • In Practice
    • Bridge Risk
      • Defining Bridge Risk
      • Assessing Bridge Risk
      • Mitigating Bridge Risk
      • In Practice
    • Oracle Risk
      • Defining Oracle Risks
      • Assessing Oracle Risks
      • Managing Oracle Risks
      • In Practice
  • 🥷UNSYSTEMATIC RISKS
    • Software Risk
      • Defining Software Risks
      • Assessing Software Risks
      • Managing Software Risks
      • In Practice
    • Economic/Financial Risks
      • Defining Economic Risks
      • Assessing Economic Risks
      • Managing Economic Risks
      • Tokenomics Risk
        • Defining Tokenomics Risks
        • Assessing Tokenomics Risk
        • Managing Tokenomics Risk
      • MEV Risk
        • Defining MEV Risk
        • Assessing MEV Risk
        • Managing MEV Risk
      • Credit Risk
        • Defining Credit Risk
        • Assessing Credit Risk
        • Managing Credit Risk
    • Governance Risk
      • Defining Governance Risk
      • Assessing Governance Risk
      • Managing Governance Risk
    • Standards Conformance Risks
      • Defining Standards Conformance Risks
      • Assessing Standards Conformance Risks
      • Managing Standards Conformance Risks
    • Security Risk
      • Security Risk Assessment
      • Security Risk Mitigation
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Liquidity Risk Assessment
  • EEA Liquidity Risk Assessment Guidelines
  1. Systematic Risks
  2. Market Risk
  3. Liquidity Risk

Assessing Liquidity Risk

Liquidity Risk Assessment

Assessing liquidity risk for a given DeFi protocol involves analyzing various factors that influence the ability to buy or sell assets without causing significant price impact. Here’s a step-by-step approach to assessing liquidity risk in a DeFi protocol:

1. Analyze Liquidity Depth in Pools or Markets

  • Total Value Locked (TVL): Examine the TVL in liquidity pools or the protocol overall. Higher TVL indicates more depth, potentially reducing liquidity risk.

  • Order Book Depth (if applicable): For DeFi exchanges with order books, assess the depth to understand how large orders would affect the market price.

2. Evaluate Asset Volatility

  • Asset Types: Consider the types of assets supported by the protocol. Stablecoins may offer lower liquidity risk compared to more volatile tokens.

  • Historical Price Volatility: Look at the historical price data of assets within the protocol to gauge potential future volatility and its impact on liquidity.

3. Assess the Protocol’s Market Activity

  • Trading Volume: High trading volumes can indicate healthy liquidity, while low volumes may signal liquidity risk.

  • Active Users: The number of active users or transactions can offer insights into the protocol’s liquidity. More activity usually means higher liquidity.

4. Review Mechanisms to Mitigate Liquidity Risk

  • Liquidity Incentives: Many DeFi protocols incentivize liquidity provision through yield farming or liquidity mining. Assess the sustainability and attractiveness of these incentives.

  • Slippage Protection: Some protocols have mechanisms to protect users from excessive slippage, which can be a sign of robust liquidity management.

5. Consider External Factors

  • Integration with Other Protocols: Protocols integrated with multiple other DeFi projects may have better liquidity due to the network effect.

  • Market Conditions: General market sentiment and conditions can influence liquidity. In bear markets, liquidity can dry up more quickly.

6. Examine Smart Contract and Protocol Health

  • Audit Reports: Check for audit reports from reputable security firms to assess the protocol's resilience against smart contract risks, which can affect liquidity.

  • Historical Performance and Incidents: Past performance, including any incidents of smart contract failures or exploits, can impact user trust and liquidity.

7. Regulatory and Legal Risks

  • Regulatory Changes: Be aware of any potential regulatory actions that could affect the protocol’s operation or user access, impacting liquidity.

8. User and Community Sentiment

  • Community Engagement: A strong and active community can be a positive indicator of protocol health and sustainability.

  • Social Media and Forums: Sentiment on platforms like Twitter, Reddit, and Telegram can provide early warning signs of liquidity issues.

EEA Liquidity Risk Assessment Guidelines

Key Metrics

Rehypothecation Policies

Protocol Reports SHOULD disclose any practices or policies related to rehypothecation, or other forms of leveraging collateral.

Liquidity Pool composition

Protocol Reports SHOULD cover liquidity pools' composition, including depth and diversity of liquidity providers.

Liquidity management

Protocol Reports SHOULD detail liquidity management.

Historical Volatility

Protocol Reports SHOULD provide historical price volatility data for underlying assets.

PreviousDefining Liquidity RiskNextManaging Liquidity Risk

Last updated 1 year ago

Protocol Reports SHOULD outline current .

🥷
§ 2.6 Key DeFi Metrics