Assessing Governance Risk

Assessing governance risks for a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol involves evaluating a range of factors that influence how decisions are made, how power is distributed, and how changes can affect the protocol's security, functionality, and future development.

  1. Token Distribution and Voter Rights

  • Is token ownership and control concentrated in a few 'whale' wallets or distributed?

  • Do all governance tokens have equal voting rights?

  • Are there any vesting schedules or locked token privileges?

  • Does the protocol stakeholder distribution permit capture by vested interests?

  1. Voting Participation

  • What are the typical participation rates in governance proposals?

  • Are there signs of voter apathy, such as low quorum thresholds being activated?

  • Are there any incentives, gamification or UI nudges to encourage voting?

  1. Upgrade Governance

  • What is the process for spearheading and approving protocol upgrades?

  • Are upgrade risks and contingencies communicated clearly to users?

  • Is there a time delay between proposal and activation to permit objection?

  1. Safeguards Against Governance Attacks

  • Are there emergency brakes, admin keys or other technical safeguards if a proposal with unintended consequences is approved?

  • What is the process if the community votes differ from core developer recommendations?

  1. Oversight of External Dependencies

  • What external systems like oracles, bridges etc. does the protocol depend on?

  • Are there processes to evaluate risks from dependencies like infra concentration?

  1. Treasury Management and Financial Planning

  • How decentralized and transparent is treasury fund management?

  • What checks and balances govern fund allocation to developers, liquidity programs etc?

  • Is there a financial plan for protocol sustainability beyond reliance on high token demand?

Assessing these facets covering participation incentives, technical resilience, emergency preparedness, financial oversight and external dependency risk provides a holistic evaluation of the governance risks posed to a DeFi protocol.

1. Governance Structure

  • Type of Governance: Determine whether it's on-chain, off-chain, or a hybrid model.

  • Decision-making Process: Understand the process for proposing and voting on decisions.

  • Voting Rights: Examine who has voting rights and how these rights are allocated (e.g., token-based, reputation-based).

  • Quorum Requirements: Check the minimum participation needed for a vote to be valid.

  • Proposal Thresholds: Identify the requirements for submitting proposals (e.g., token holdings).

2. Token Distribution

  • Initial Distribution: Analyze the fairness and breadth of the initial token distribution.

  • Concentration of Tokens: Assess the risk of token concentration among a small number of holders.

  • Inflation/Deflation Mechanisms: Understand how new tokens are minted or burned.

3. Transparency and Communication

  • Documentation: Check for comprehensive and clear documentation on governance processes.

  • Community Engagement: Evaluate the level of community involvement and feedback mechanisms.

  • Change Logs and Updates: Review the history of changes and how they were communicated.

4. Security of Governance Processes

  • Smart Contract Audits: Ensure that smart contracts related to governance have been audited by reputable firms.

  • Bug Bounty Programs: Check for the presence of bug bounty programs to incentivize the discovery of vulnerabilities.

  • Recovery Mechanisms: Understand the protocols in place for recovering from a failed governance decision or a technical vulnerability.

5. Incentive Alignment

  • Stakeholder Incentives: Assess whether the incentives of various stakeholders (developers, token holders, users) are aligned.

  • Long-term vs Short-term Incentives: Evaluate if governance mechanisms favor long-term sustainability over short-term gains.

6. Resistance to Attacks

  • Sybil Attacks: Determine the protocol's defenses against fake accounts manipulating votes.

  • Bribery and Vote Buying: Assess the risk and mechanisms in place to prevent vote buying and bribery.

  • Flash Loan Attacks: Examine vulnerabilities to flash loan attacks in governance decisions.

7. Upgradeability and Flexibility

  • Protocol Upgrades: Understand the process for implementing upgrades and who controls it.

  • Emergency Decision Making: Review mechanisms for making quick decisions in emergencies.

  • Regulatory Risk: Consider the impact of current and future regulations on governance processes.

  • Liability and Legal Structure: Assess the legal structure of the entity (if any) behind the protocol and potential liabilities.

9. Economic and Financial Risks

  • Governance Token Volatility: Evaluate the impact of token price volatility on governance.

  • Financial Reserves: Check the protocol's financial health and reserves for sustaining operations and development.

10. Environmental and Social Governance (ESG)

  • Environmental Impact: Consider the environmental impact of governance, especially if it involves energy-intensive processes.

  • Community and Social Impact: Evaluate how governance decisions impact the broader community and societal norms.

This checklist provides a structured approach to assessing governance risks in DeFi protocols. It's important to note that governance is an evolving aspect of DeFi, and continuous monitoring and adaptation are necessary to address emerging risks and challenges.

Last updated